← Back to Projects
Research

gnaroshi_vla

This workspace separates model adapters, methods, environments, and result locations so a VLA run can be inspected later.

In developmentCLI

Verified artifact

Verified gnaroshi_vla repository evidence showing the directory structure, an actual configuration, a generated run manifest, and a redacted sanity-run terminal result.
The public evidence shows repository structure, a real configuration, a generated run manifest, and a redacted sanity-run result.The shown sanity run is example evidence, not a benchmark result.

At a glance

For
Researchers comparing VLA implementations
Primary use
Configure a model and method combination, run a small check, and preserve the run context.
Product status
In development
Platforms
CLI

Research question

Which parts of a VLA experiment can be shared without erasing differences that matter?

The project explores how much experiment structure can be shared across VLA implementations without hiding model-specific behavior.

Approach

  • Keep model-specific behavior behind explicit adapters.
  • Separate reusable methods from environment and launch details.

Example workflow

Example experiment

Configure a small example run and inspect the evidence it leaves behind.

  1. Choose the run

    Select an architecture, method, environment, and experiment configuration.

  2. Run a sanity check

    Verify composition and launch wiring with a deliberately small check.

  3. Inspect the manifest

    Review the resolved configuration and environment snapshot.

  4. Open the result directory

    Follow the explicit result path without treating unchecked output as a conclusion.

The shown sanity run is example evidence, not a benchmark result.

Reproducibility

  • Composed configuration records every selected layer.
  • Run manifests and environment snapshots preserve context.

Current evidence

The current evidence establishes the experiment structure and a lightweight execution check only.

Unknowns

  • Whether the same adapter boundary remains useful across more VLA families.
  • Which efficiency comparisons remain fair across implementations.

Key features

  • Separate model, method, environment, and experiment configuration
  • Small adapter boundary for Seer and SimVLA
  • Run manifests and environment snapshots
  • Explicit result directories

Data and privacy

The public repository contains structure and lightweight evidence, not private datasets, credentials, or unpublished benchmark claims.

Tech stack

Languages

  • Python
  • Shell

Data

  • YAML

Technology icons are repository-owned category symbols; the verified technology name remains visible.

Current state

The repository contains Seer and SimVLA integration structure, shared method modules, and run-context tools. It does not present benchmark results.

Current limitations

  • The common adapter boundary is still being refined.
  • Cross-model result comparisons need reviewed runs before publication.

Technical notes

  • Python owns orchestration and adapters.
  • YAML keeps model, method, environment, and node choices explicit.

Next milestones

  • Complete consistent sanity checks across adapters.
  • Record reviewed comparison runs without overstating their scope.